Bulpitt v. Hartley, et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION and ORDER 17 for Dismissal of Petition for Writ of HC with Prejudice, signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/1/10. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MICHAEL SATRIS SBN 67413 CARRIE KOJIMOTO, SBN 152824 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL SATRIS Post Office Box 337 Bolinas, CA 94924 Telephone: (415) 8689209 Fax: (415) 8682658 Email: satris@sbcglobal.net Attorneys for Petitioner DONALD BULPITT EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of the State of California MARY JO GRAVES Chief Assistant Attorney General JULIE L. GARLAND Senior Assistant Attorney General JENNIFER A. NEILL Supervising Deputy Attorney General PAMELA B. HOOLEY, State Bar No. 161616 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 942442550 Telephone: (916) 3231951 Fax: (916) 3228288 Email: pamela.hooley@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Respondent UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DONALD CLAUDE BULPITT, Petitioner, No. 2:08CV00898WBSKJN vs. STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS WITH JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden PREJUDICE Respondent. 1 Stipulation and Order for Dismissal of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with Prejudice Bulpitt v. Hartley No. 2:08-CV-00898-WBS-KJN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties hereby stipulate that the petition for writ of habeas corpus may be dismissed with prejudice and submit this joint request for the Court to so order. Dated: May 25, 2010 /s/ Carrie Kojimoto___ CARRIE KOJIMOTO Attorney for Petitioner Dated : May 25, 2010 SO ORDERED. June 1, 2010 /s/ Pamela Hooley PAMELA B. HOOLEY Attorney for Respondent 2 Stipulation and Order for Dismissal of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with Prejudice Bulpitt v. Hartley No. 2:08-CV-00898-WBS-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?