Johnson v. Proline Concrete Tools, Inc.
STANDING 251 STIPULATED ORDER signed by Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 02/04/09. (Benson, A.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LINDSAY JOHNSON, Plaintiff(s), vs. PROLINE CONCRETE TOOLS, INC., Defendant(s). ______________________________________/ Defendant filed a discovery motion on January 30, 2009 set for hearing on February 26, 2009 @ 10:00 Notwithstanding the three days specified by E.D. Cal. L.R. 37-251 the joint statement shall be filed in no later than five court days before the scheduled hearing. Notwithstanding E.D. Cal. L.R. 5-133(f), if the joint statement is more than 25 pages, or the attachments are longer than 50 pages, the copy shall be hand delivered or sent by overnight mail to chambers on the day of filing. The filing deadline, accordingly, will be February 19, 2009. The dispute may be organized by category, with specific discovery items attached, if appropriate, as an exhibit. For each disputed category or individual item, include: (1) the specific disputed discovery category or item; (2) the response; (3) the moving party's position; and (4) the opposition. E.D.Cal. L.R. 37-251(c)(3). Do not file separate briefing. Id. Privilege objections must comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5). Except in extraordinary circumstances, the party claiming privilege may not submit a post-hearing privilege log. The failure properly to support a privilege objection with a privilege log may be deemed to waive it. The moving party is responsible for filing the joint statement. The opposing party nevertheless must timely draft and submit its portion. Failure of either party to use best efforts to ensure timely filing will be cause for sanctions. Dated: February 4, 2009 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows ___________________________________ GREGORY G. HOLLOWS U.S. Magistrate Judge johnson909.251-2 2:08CV00909 LKK-GGH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?