Duncan v. Ruaeda et al

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 14 in full, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/15/2009. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. RUAEDA, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On October 30, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: \\\\\ 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PATRICK DUNCAN, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-08-0915 JAM GGH P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /dunc0915.800 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 30, 2008, are adopted in full; and 2. This action is dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). DATED: January 15, 2009 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?