Dagdagan v. City of Vallejo et al

Filing 36

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER regarding confidential materials signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/22/09. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
1 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301 Terence J. Cassidy, SBN 99180 350 University Ave., Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF VALLEJO, OFFICER J. WENTZ, OFFICER JOHN B O Y D , OFFICER MELVILLE P e te r W. Alfert, SBN 83139 H I N T O N , ALFERT & SUMNER 1646 No. California Blvd. Suite 600 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 925-932-6006 925-932-3412 (fax) alfert@hinton-law.com T o d d Boley, SBN 68119 A tto rn e y At Law 4 7 6 Third Street O a k la n d , CA 94607 te le p h o n e (510) 836-4500 f a cs im ile (510) 649-5170 A tto rn e ys for Plaintiff 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PORTER * SCOTT ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SACRAM EN TO , CA 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6 I N THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA M A C A R IO BELEN DAGDAGAN, P l a i n t if f s , S T IP U L A T E D PROTECTIVE ORDER vs. C I T Y OF VALLEJO; VALLEJO OFFICER J . WENTZ (ID#524); VALLEJO OFFICER J O H N BOYD (ID # 589); and DOES 1-30, D e f e n d a n t. / /// /// /// /// 1 S T IP U L A T E D PROTECTIVE ORDER 00683158.WPD C as e No.: CIV. 2:08-CV-0922-GEB GGH w w w .p o r t er s c o t t .c o m 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PORTER * SCOTT ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SACRAM EN TO , CA 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6 P la in tif f MACARIO BELEN DAGDAGAN and Defendants CITY OF VALLEJO, W E N T Z , BOYD, and MELVILLE by and through their undersigned counsel, and subject to th e approval of the court, stipulate to the following Protective Order, as set forth below: 1. T h is is an action pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, arising from the a rr e s t of Plaintiff and subsequent search of his residence pursuant to search warrant. 2. P la in tif f has propounded Requests for Production of Documents, whereby P lain tiff seeks information and documents, including sensitive and private personnel file in f o rm a tio n involving the parties, which are confidential. Additionally, Plaintiff seeks in f o rm a tio n and documents, including sensitive and confidential policies and procedures w h ic h are not for public consumption. 3. C o n f id e n tia l information is information which has not been made public and is privileged and confidential and protected from public disclosure under applicable law. M a te r i a l designated as "confidential" under this order include the information contained th e re in , and any summaries, copies, abstracts, or documents derived in whole or in part from m ate rials designated as confidential (herein after "confidential material"). 4. C o n f id e n tia l material will be produced in conjunction with further responses to Requests for Production of Documents, clearly marked as Confidential, and redacted as n e c e s s a r y to protect the rights and privacy of third-parties. 5. C o n f id e n tia l material produced pursuant to this order shall be used only for the p u rp o s e of the prosecution, defense, or settlement of this action and for no other purpose, co n fid en tial material may be disclosed or made available only to the court, to court reporters re ta in e d in this action, to counsel for a party (including the paralegal, clerical, and secretarial s ta f f employed by such counsel), and to the "qualified persons" designated below: a. Experts or consultants (together with their clerical staff) retained by s u c h counsel to assist in the prosecution, defense or settlement of this action; b. c. /// 2 S T IP U L A T E D PROTECTIVE ORDER 00683158.WPD A witness at any deposition or proceedings in this action; and Any other person as to whom the parties inviting agree in writing. w w w .p o r t er s c o t t .c o m 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PORTER * SCOTT ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SACRAM EN TO , CA 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6 P r io r to receiving any confidential material, each "qualified person" shall be provided w i t h a copy of this Order and shall execute a non-disclosure agreement in the form of A ttac h m e n t A, the original copy of which shall be maintained by the counsel who is p r o v i d in g these materials. 6. A n y party that files or intends to file with the Court, for purposes of a d ju d ic a tio n or to use at trial, documents or materials, including the existence of such m a te ria l in any pleading, motion, exhibit or other paper, designated as Confidential pursuant to this Stipulated Protective Order, should, prior to filing such Confidential documents or m a te r ia ls , move the Court for an order sealing such documents upon a showing of good cause in compliance with the requirements of California Eastern District Court Local Rules 39-140 a n d 39-141, which are heretofore fully incorporated by reference. 7. U p o n the issuance of an order of the Court sealing such documents, all d o c u m e n t s or materials designated as Confidential pursuant to this Stipulated Protective O rd e r, and all papers or documents containing information or materials designated as " C o n f id e n tia l" that are filed with the Court for any purpose shall be filed and served under s e a l, with the following statement affixed to the document or information: " T h is envelope is sealed pursuant to the order of the Court and contains Confidential in f o rm a tio n filed in this case by [name of party] and is not to be opened nor the contents th e re o f displayed or revealed except by order of the Court." 8. T h e portion of any deposition in which confidential materials are discussed s h a ll be taken only in the presence of qualified persons, as defined above. 9. N o th in g herein shall impose any restrictions on the use or disclosure by a p a rty of material obtained by such party independent of discovery in this action, whether or n o t such material is also obtained through discovery in this action, or from disclosing its own c o n f id e n tia l material as it deems appropriate. Receipt by any party of any confidential in f o rm a tio n shall not be either an admission or claim that the information is private, c o n f id e n tia l, proprietary, and/or trade secret, as asserted by the propounding party, nor an a d m i s s io n with respect to the authenticity, competency, relevance or materiality thereof. 3 S T IP U L A T E D PROTECTIVE ORDER 00683158.WPD w w w .p o r t er s c o t t .c o m 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PORTER * SCOTT ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SACRAM EN TO , CA 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6 10. A ll documents designated as "Confidential" shall be treated as such and shall b e subject to the provisions hereof unless and until one of the following occurs: a. T h e party who claims that the material is Confidential Information w ith d ra w s such designation in writing; or b. T h e Court rules the material is not Confidential Information. If a party c o n te n d s that any material is not entitled to confidential treatment, such party may at any time a p p ly to the Court for an order removing the confidential designation from any material. 11. This Order shall be without prejudice to present a motion to the court under F e d e ra l Rule of Civil Procedure 26 (c) for a separate Protective Order as to any particular d o c u m e n t or information, including restrictions different from those as specified herein. This s h a ll not be deemed to prejudice the parties in any way in any future application for m o d ifica tio n of this Stipulation and Order. 12. N o th in g in this Order nor the production of any information or document under th e terms of this Order nor any proceedings pursuant to this Order, shall be deemed to have th e affect of an admission or waiver of objections or privileges by either party or of altering th e confidentiality or non-confidentiality of any such document or information or altering any e x is tin g right or obligation of any party or the absence thereof. 13. A t the conclusion of this litigation, counsel for Plaintiff shall return all c o n f id e n tia l and derivative materials within 60 calendar days, or shall certify to the D e f en d a n ts that all such materials have been destroyed. 14. T h is Order shall survive the final termination of this action, and the court shall re ta in jurisdiction to resolve any dispute concerning the use of information disclosed h e re u n d e r. /// /// /// /// /// 4 S T IP U L A T E D PROTECTIVE ORDER 00683158.WPD w w w .p o r t er s c o t t .c o m 1 2 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO STIPULATED. D a te d July 7, 2009 HINTON, ALFERT & SUMNER A Professional Corporation By /s/ Peter W. Alfert Peter W. Alfert A tto rn e ys for Plaintiff D a te d July 7, 2009 7 8 9 B y: 10 11 12 D a te d July 7, 2009 13 14 By 15 16 17 ORDER 18 H a v in g reviewed the above Stipulation, and good cause appearing, 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 J u ly 22, 2009 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PORTER * SCOTT ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SACRAM EN TO , CA 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6 T o d d Boley A tto rn e y at Law /s/ Todd Boley Todd Boley A tto rn e y for Plaintiff PORTER SCOTT A Professional Corporation /s/ John R. Whitefleet Terence J. Cassidy J o h n R. Whitefleet A tto rn e ys for Defendants /s/ Gregory G. Hollows ______________________________ M a g is tra te Judge of the United States District C o u rt Eastern District of California d a g d a g a n .o r d 5 S T IP U L A T E D PROTECTIVE ORDER 00683158.WPD w w w .p o r t er s c o t t .c o m

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?