(PS) Brewer v. City of Fairfield PD et al

Filing 46

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/13/09 ORDERING that pltf's request for the appointment of counsel 41 and 44 is DENIED. Pltf's motion for summary jdugment 43 is DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send pltf a copy of the lr's. (Kastilahn, A) Modified docket text on 9/3/2009 (Waggoner, D).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. CITY OF FAIRFIELD, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff has again requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied. Plaintiff has also filed a motion for summary judgment. The motion does not comply with Local Rule 56-260(a) and will therefore be denied without prejudice. ///// 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BOBBY JOE BREWER, III, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-08-971 FCD KJM PS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 006 brewer.msj-cou Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (docket no. 41) is denied. 2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (docket no. 43) is denied without prejudice. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the local rules. DATED: June 13, 2009. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?