Rodriguez v. Tilton, et al

Filing 172

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 5/30/2013 DENYING 156 Motion for Reconsideration. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LUIS VALENZUELA RODRIGUEZ, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 13 vs. JAMES TILTON, et al., Defendants. 14 15 No. 2:08-cv-1028 GEB AC P ORDER / On December 3, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff’s 16 motion for appointment of counsel. On March 20, 2013, plaintiff filed a request for 17 reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 303(b), states “rulings by Magistrate Judges shall be 18 final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within fourteen days . . . from the date 19 of service of the ruling on the parties. . .” E.D. Local Rule 303(b). Plaintiff’s request for 20 reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order of December 3, 2012 is therefore untimely. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s March 20, 2013, request 22 for reconsideration (ECF No. 156) is denied. 23 Dated: May 30, 2013 24 25 26 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?