Rodriguez v. Tilton, et al

Filing 233

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/03/16 ordering that the request is granted and the parties are to file a joint status report on or before 3/04/16. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 THOMAS A. WOODS (SB #210050) thomas.woods@stoel.com STOEL RIVES LLP 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 447-0700 Facsimile: (916) 447-4781 Attorneys for Plaintiff LUIS VALENZUELA RODRIGUEZ 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 LUIS VALENZUELA RODRIGUEZ, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:08-cv-01028-GEB-AC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT JAMES TILTON, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S TOEL R IVES LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SACRAMENTO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME 81013885.1 0099820-08060 2:08-CV-01028-GEB-AC 1 The current deadline for the parties to file their joint status report is February 3, 2016. 2 (Docket No. 230). Counsel for the parties have worked cooperatively to date and have even 3 discussed grounds for potential amendment of the operative pleadings. Stipulation Exhibit 1 4 corroborates that cooperation and shows recent unexpected developments giving rise to this 5 Stipulation. 6 This request for a 30-day continuance of the joint status report filing deadline is made now 7 because counsel for the parties were only able to confirm as recently as yesterday (February 2, 8 2016) that incarcerated Plaintiff Luis Rodriguez was recently, unexpectedly hospitalized on 9 January 24, 2016 as an in-patient at TriCity Hospital in San Diego. Plaintiff’s counsel had been 10 curious as to why Plaintiff had not contacted counsel on expected dates to discuss his case -- this 11 hospitalization is the reason why discussions have not been possible. Reports are that the 12 hospitalization may last as long as two weeks from February 1, 2016. 13 The February 3, 2016 joint status report submission date had been deliberately selected by 14 Plaintiff’s counsel because: 1) Plaintiff was not hospitalized at the time the last request for an 15 extension was made, this hospitalization was not expected, thus discussions with Plaintiff 16 concerning his case were set and possible, and 2) Plaintiff’s counsel commences a three week 17 period of leave from February 5, 2016 through February 29, 2016. The plan and intent was to 18 complete discussions with Plaintiff and submit the Joint Statement prior to Plaintiff’s counsel’s 19 leave beginning February 5. With these recent unexpected developments preventing completion 20 of discussion with Plaintiff and meet-and-confer on a preparation of a complete Joint Statement, it 21 is not possible for counsel for the parties to meet the February 3, 2016 deadline. 22 23 For these reasons, the parties request a 30 day continuation of the deadline to complete the Joint Status Report, until March 4, 2016. 24 25 Although the file has been reviewed, Plaintiff’s pro bono counsel has not had a full and 26 complete opportunity to discuss with Plaintiff (who is incarcerated in San Diego County) the 27 outcome of counsel’s review and recommendations for next steps. Plaintiff’s pro bono counsel 28 has arranged to speak with Plaintiff, who has limited access to telephones. Counsel anticipates S TOEL R IVES LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SACRAMENTO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME 81013885.1 0099820-08060 -1- 2:08-CV-01028-GEB-AC 1 that a 30-day continuance will accommodate Plaintiff’s and Plaintiff’s counsel’s schedules to 2 complete the joint statement. 3 For these reasons, the parties have stipulated to and request an extension to March 4, 4 2016, to ensure that Plaintiff’s pro bono counsel has adequate opportunity to discuss the case with 5 his client. No trial date has been set in this case. 6 7 DATED: February 3, 2016 8 STOEL RIVES LLP 9 10 By: /s/ Thomas A. Woods THOMAS A. WOODS Attorneys for Plaintiff LUIS VALENZUELA RODRIGUEZ 11 12 13 DATED: February 3, 2016 14 WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES 15 16 By: /s/ Matthew Ross Wilson (as authorized on February 3, 2016) MATTHEW ROSS WILSON Attorneys for Defendants STOREY, GALLOWAY, DAVIS, VILLALVA, PEIRI, SMITH, ZIEBERT, HAMILTON, SANTOS, CHAVEZ, LINDE, BUENO, WOHLERS, BRIMHALL, JOHNSON, POWELL, TAYLOR, RODGERS, MOLIN (sued herein as “Mullen”), AYERS (TUCKER) and REYES 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S TOEL R IVES LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SACRAMENTO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME 81013885.1 0099820-08060 -2- 2:08-CV-01028-GEB-AC 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 3 Based on the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request is granted and the parties are to file a joint status report on or before March 4, 4 2016. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 3, 2016 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S TOEL R IVES LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SACRAMENTO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME 81013885.1 0099820-08060 -3- 2:08-CV-01028-GEB-AC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?