Rodriguez v. Tilton, et al
Filing
233
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/03/16 ordering that the request is granted and the parties are to file a joint status report on or before 3/04/16. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
THOMAS A. WOODS (SB #210050)
thomas.woods@stoel.com
STOEL RIVES LLP
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 447-0700
Facsimile: (916) 447-4781
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LUIS VALENZUELA RODRIGUEZ
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
LUIS VALENZUELA RODRIGUEZ,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 2:08-cv-01028-GEB-AC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE REQUEST TO EXTEND
TIME TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT
JAMES TILTON, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
S TOEL R IVES LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SACRAMENTO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME
81013885.1 0099820-08060
2:08-CV-01028-GEB-AC
1
The current deadline for the parties to file their joint status report is February 3, 2016.
2
(Docket No. 230). Counsel for the parties have worked cooperatively to date and have even
3
discussed grounds for potential amendment of the operative pleadings. Stipulation Exhibit 1
4
corroborates that cooperation and shows recent unexpected developments giving rise to this
5
Stipulation.
6
This request for a 30-day continuance of the joint status report filing deadline is made now
7
because counsel for the parties were only able to confirm as recently as yesterday (February 2,
8
2016) that incarcerated Plaintiff Luis Rodriguez was recently, unexpectedly hospitalized on
9
January 24, 2016 as an in-patient at TriCity Hospital in San Diego. Plaintiff’s counsel had been
10
curious as to why Plaintiff had not contacted counsel on expected dates to discuss his case -- this
11
hospitalization is the reason why discussions have not been possible. Reports are that the
12
hospitalization may last as long as two weeks from February 1, 2016.
13
The February 3, 2016 joint status report submission date had been deliberately selected by
14
Plaintiff’s counsel because: 1) Plaintiff was not hospitalized at the time the last request for an
15
extension was made, this hospitalization was not expected, thus discussions with Plaintiff
16
concerning his case were set and possible, and 2) Plaintiff’s counsel commences a three week
17
period of leave from February 5, 2016 through February 29, 2016. The plan and intent was to
18
complete discussions with Plaintiff and submit the Joint Statement prior to Plaintiff’s counsel’s
19
leave beginning February 5. With these recent unexpected developments preventing completion
20
of discussion with Plaintiff and meet-and-confer on a preparation of a complete Joint Statement, it
21
is not possible for counsel for the parties to meet the February 3, 2016 deadline.
22
23
For these reasons, the parties request a 30 day continuation of the deadline to complete the
Joint Status Report, until March 4, 2016.
24
25
Although the file has been reviewed, Plaintiff’s pro bono counsel has not had a full and
26
complete opportunity to discuss with Plaintiff (who is incarcerated in San Diego County) the
27
outcome of counsel’s review and recommendations for next steps. Plaintiff’s pro bono counsel
28
has arranged to speak with Plaintiff, who has limited access to telephones. Counsel anticipates
S TOEL R IVES LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SACRAMENTO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME
81013885.1 0099820-08060
-1-
2:08-CV-01028-GEB-AC
1
that a 30-day continuance will accommodate Plaintiff’s and Plaintiff’s counsel’s schedules to
2
complete the joint statement.
3
For these reasons, the parties have stipulated to and request an extension to March 4,
4
2016, to ensure that Plaintiff’s pro bono counsel has adequate opportunity to discuss the case with
5
his client. No trial date has been set in this case.
6
7
DATED: February 3, 2016
8
STOEL RIVES LLP
9
10
By: /s/ Thomas A. Woods
THOMAS A. WOODS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LUIS VALENZUELA RODRIGUEZ
11
12
13
DATED: February 3, 2016
14
WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES
15
16
By: /s/ Matthew Ross Wilson
(as authorized on February 3, 2016)
MATTHEW ROSS WILSON
Attorneys for Defendants
STOREY, GALLOWAY, DAVIS,
VILLALVA, PEIRI, SMITH, ZIEBERT,
HAMILTON, SANTOS, CHAVEZ,
LINDE, BUENO, WOHLERS,
BRIMHALL, JOHNSON, POWELL,
TAYLOR, RODGERS, MOLIN (sued
herein as “Mullen”), AYERS (TUCKER)
and REYES
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
S TOEL R IVES LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SACRAMENTO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME
81013885.1 0099820-08060
-2-
2:08-CV-01028-GEB-AC
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
3
Based on the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
that the request is granted and the parties are to file a joint status report on or before March 4,
4
2016.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: February 3, 2016
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
S TOEL R IVES LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SACRAMENTO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME
81013885.1 0099820-08060
-3-
2:08-CV-01028-GEB-AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?