General Produce Co., Ltd vs. Alex R Thomas, Co. et al
Filing
43
ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/31/09 ORDERING that the judgment creditor having made 36 application a subpoena in a civil case may issue commanding the appearance of Arthur S. Ito to appear as a witness in this matter concerning the assets and liabilities of the judgment debtors. (Benson, A.)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DANIEL A. McDANIEL - SBN 77363 NOMELLINI, GRILLI & McDANIEL PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATIONS 235 East Weber Avenue Post Office Box 1461 Stockton, California 95201-1461 Telephone: (209) 465-5883 Facsimile: (209) 465-3956 Attorneys for Plaintiff General Produce Co., Ltd.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ALEX R. THOMAS & CO., a California corporation doing business as GOT FRUIT ) ) and RIPPLE RILEY THOMAS; MENDOCINO GOLD GIFTS, LLC, a ) California limited liability company; RIPPLE ) RILEY THOMAS, LLC, a California limited ) liability company; ALEX R. THOMAS, III, ) an individual; STEPHEN N. THOMAS, an ) ) individual; and ANNE I. THOMAS, ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) GENERAL PRODUCE CO., LTD., a California limited partnership,
Case No. 2:08-CV-01084-JAM-EFB
ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: September 23, 2009 9:30 a.m. 25 Hon. Edmund F. Brennan, U.S. Magistrate Judge
The judgment creditor having made application pursuant to Rule 69 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and California Code of Civil Procedure section 708.130, a subpoena in a civil case may issue commanding the appearance of Arthur S. Ito to appear as a witness in this matter concerning the assets and liabilities of the judgment debtors. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 31, 2009.
_________________________________________
Order for Subpoena - Arthur S. Ito
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?