General Produce Co., Ltd vs. Alex R Thomas, Co. et al

Filing 80

STIPULATION and ORDER 79 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/23/10: The hearing for Dft Anne I Thomas' 70 Motion for Summary Judgment, and dfts Arthur S. Ito and Joan Bell's 71 Motion to Dismiss is CONT'D to 10/6/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez.(Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Daniel E. Post, Esq. (Bar No. 172948) Allison C. Fries, Esq. (Bar No. 260306) ANDERSON, ZEIGLER, DISHAROON, GALLAGHER & GRAY 50 Old Courthouse Square, 5th Fl. (95404) P.O. Box 1498 Santa Rosa, CA 95402-1498 Telephone: 707/545-4910 Facsimile: 707/544-0260 Attorneys for Anne I. Thomas, Arthur S. Ito and Joan Bell U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GENERAL PRODUCE CO., LTD., a California limited partnership, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ALEX R. THOMAS & CO., a California ) corporation doing business as GOT ) FRUIT and RIPPLE RILEY THOMAS; ) MENDOCINO GOLD GIFTS, LLC, a ) California limited liability company; ) RIPPLE RILEY THOMAS, LLC, a ) California limited liability company; ) ALEX R. THOMAS, III, an individual; ) STEPHEN N. THOMAS, an individual; ) ANNE I. THOMAS; ARTHUR S. ITO, an ) individual; JOAN BELL, an individual; ) and SAVINGS BANK OF MENDOCINO ) COUNTY, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. 2:08-cv-01084-JAM-EFB STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS; AND ORDER THEREON [Local Rule 78-230(g)] Date: Time: Ctrm/Dept: Judge: Location: 9/1/10 9:30 a.m. 6 (14th Floor) Hon. John A. Mendez 501 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814 ANDERSON, ZEIGLER, DISHAROON, GALLAGHER & GRAY 10 11 12 50 OLD COURTHOUSE SQUARE, FIFTH FLOOR P.O. BOX 1498 SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA 95402-1498 (707) 545-4910 FAX (707) 544-0260 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW Defendants Anne I. Thomas, Arthur S. Ito and Joan Bell, and plaintiff General Produce Co., Ltd., a California limited partnership, hereby stipulate that defendant Anne I. Thomas' pending motion for summary judgment, currently set for hearing on September 1, 2010, and defendants Arthur S. Ito and Joan Bell's pending motion to dismiss, currently set for hearing on September 1, 2010, shall be continued to October 6, 2010, which is the current hearing date for plaintiff's pending motion to file a third 1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS; AND PROPOSED ORDER THEREON PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 amended complaint. The parties stipulate that the defendants' time to reply to plaintiff's opposition to their respective pending motions shall be calculated based upon the new hearing date of October 6, 2010. SO STIPULATED. ANDERSON, ZEIGLER, DISHAROON, GALLAGHER & GRAY, Date: August 24, 2010 By Daniel E. Post Date: August 24, 2010 By Allison C. Fries Attorneys for Anne I. Thomas, Arthur S. Ito and Joan Bell NOMELLINI, GRILLI & McDANIEL Date: August 24, 2010 By /s/Daniel E. McDaniel Daniel A. McDaniel Attorneys for General Produce Co., Ltd., a California limited partnership PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS; AND PROPOSED ORDER THEREON 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER The Court having the reviewed the parties' above stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 8/23/2010 /s/ John A. Mendez____ Judge John A. Mendez PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 3 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS; AND PROPOSED ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?