Williams v. Braida et al
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 01/14/10 ordering plaintiff's motions for the appointment of counsel 29 33 34 are denied as moot. (Plummer, M)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
2/mp
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DONALD LEE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, vs. A. BRAIDA, et al., Defendants. / The court docket reflects that this case has settled. Therefore, plaintiff's requests for appointment of counsel are moot. Moreover, there is no need for the filing of pretrial statements. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motions for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 29, 33 & 34) are denied as moot. DATED: January 14, 2010. ORDER No. CIV S-08-1138 FCD KJM P
26
will1138.31(2)
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
