Barker v. Hubbard et al

Filing 101

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/25/11 ORDERING that pltf shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the 91 Motion to Dismiss by 9/26/11; dfts may file a reply within 7 days thereafter. (Manzer, C)

1
2
3
4
5

Lynn Hubbard III, SBN 69773
Scottlynn J Hubbard IV, SBN 212970
Disabled Advocacy Group, APLC
12 Williamsburg Lane
Chico, CA 95926
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6
7

Attorneys for Plaintiff

8
9

The United States District Court

10

Eastern District Of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

) Case No. 2:08-cv-1160 WBS-CKD P
)
) Stipulation for Extension of Time to
Plaintiff,
) File an Opposition to Respond to
) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
vs.
)
California Department of Corrections )
)
and Rehabilitation, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
William Barker,

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Barker v. Hubbard, et al., Case No. 2:08-cv 1160 WBS-CKD
Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

-1-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

WHEREAS, on August 22, 2011, the Court ordered that plaintiff file an
opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants' 07/29/11 motion to
dismiss within 14 days;
WHEREAS, on August 23, 2011, the parties conferred and agreed to
extend the deadline for plaintiff’s opposition;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel is in trial for the next 3 weeks and
therefore is not able to prepare his reply by the court deadline;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the
parties hereto that the time for plaintiff to file his opposition to defendants’
motion to dismiss be extended by 3 weeks as follows:
(1) On or before September 26, 2011, Plaintiff shall file an opposition or
statement of non-opposition to defendants’ July 29, 2011 motion to dismiss;
and;
(2) Defendants may file a reply within seven days of service of plaintiff’s
opposition.
Dated: August 23, 2011

19

DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC
/s/ Scottlynn J Hubbard, IV
Scottlynn J Hubbard IV
Attorney for Plaintiff

20
21
22
23
24

Dated: August 24, 2011

/s/ Erin Sullivan_______________
Erin Sullivan
California Attorney General’s Office
Counsel for Defendants

25
26
27
28
Barker v. Hubbard, et al., Case No. 2:08-cv 1160 WBS-CKD
Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

-2-

1

ORDER

2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

3

(1) On or before September 26, 2011, Plaintiff shall file an opposition or

4
5
6

statement of non-opposition to defendants’ July 29, 2011 motion to dismiss;
and;
(2) Defendants may file a reply within seven days of service of plaintiff’s

7
8

opposition.

9
IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11
12
13

Dated: August 25, 2011

14

______________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

234b0d4o

DEAC_Sign

27
28
Barker v. Hubbard, et al., Case No. 2:08-cv 1160 WBS-CKD
Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

-3-