Barker v. Hubbard et al

Filing 115

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/7/2011 and agreed between the parties to the substitution of exhibit A to defendants' 112 Request for Judicial Notice. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
WILLIAM C. KWONG, State Bar No. 168010
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
ERIN SULLIVAN, State Bar No. 242757
Deputy Attorney General
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Foster, Kett, Sweigert,
Reyes, Mizzen, Singh, California Department of
Corrections and Rehabilitation, and the State of
California

9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

12
13
WILLIAM BARKER,

Case No. S 08-1160 WBS- CKD (PC)

14
15
v.
16
17

Plaintiff, JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
PERMITTING SUBSTITUTION OF
EXHIBIT A TO DEFENDANTS’
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

SUSAN HUBBARD, et al.,

18

Judge

The Honorable William B.
Shubb

Defendants.
Action Filed: November 19, 2007

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

On December 2, 2011, Defendants filed an Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial
Judgment. (Docket No. 109.) In support of their opposition, Defendants requested that the Court
take judicial notice of the Armstrong v. Brown, et al., No. CIV 94-2307 CW (N.D. Cal) Amended
Remedial Plan (dated January 3, 2001). (Docket No. 112.) The Armstrong Amended Remedial
Plan was attached as Exhibit A to Defendants’ Request for Judicial Notice. (See Docket Nos.
112-1 and 112-2.)

27
28
1
Stip. Re: Substitution of Ex. A to Defs.’ Req. for Jud. Not.

W. Barker v. Hubbard, et al.
Case No. C 08-1160 WBS- CKD (PC)

1

The parties jointly agree that the copy of the Armstrong Remedial Plan originally

2

submitted by Defendants is difficult to read. Accordingly, the parties jointly stipulate and

3

recommend that the Court substitute the attached cleaner copy of the Armstrong Remedial Plan as

4

Exhibit A to Defendants’ Request for Judicial Notice.

5

SO STIPULATED.

6
7

Dated:

12/5/11________

8

/s/ Erin Sullivan_______________
ERIN SULLIVAN
California Attorney General’s Office
Counsel for Defendants

9
10

SO STIPULATED.

11
12

Dated: ___12/5/11________

13
14

/s/ Scottlyn J. Hubbard, IV (as authorized on 12/2/11)
SCOTTLYN J. HUBBARD IV, ESQ.
Disabled Advocacy Group
Counsel for Plaintiff

15
16
17
18

Per the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 7, 2011
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24

SF2008200099
40492577.doc
234b0d4o

25
26
27
28
2
Stip. Re: Substitution of Ex. A to Defs.’ Req. for Jud. Not.

W. Barker v. Hubbard, et al.
Case No. C 08-1160 WBS- CKD (PC)