McFarland v. Sisto

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/11/09 ORDERING that the 13 Order to Show Cause is VACATED and the petition is deemed submitted as of 11/2/2008.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. D.K. SISTO, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges the 2006 decision by the California Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) finding him unsuitable for parole. On March 26, 2009, the undersigned issued an order to show cause why this action should not be administratively stayed pending the Ninth Circuit's decision in Hayward v. Marshall, 512 F.3d 536 (9th Cir. 2008), reh'g en banc granted, __ F.3d __, No. 06-55392 (9th Cir. filed May 16, 2008). On April 14, 2009, respondent filed a response agreeing that a stay was appropriate. Petitioner has not responded. In March 2009, this court presumed that a decision in Hayward would be shortly forthcoming. However, nearly five months have passed since that time and Hayward is still pending. It is not now clear when a decision in Hayward will be issued. Under these circumstances, staying this action could result in a lengthy delay in the disposition of petitioner's 1 ORDER IAN McFARLAND, Petitioner, No. CIV S-08-1165 JAM GGH P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 claims. In addition, judicial economy is not promoted by a stay. For these reasons, the order to show cause to stay the petition is vacated Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the March 26, 2009, order to show cause is vacated and the petition is deemed submitted as of November 2, 2008. DATED: August 11, 2009 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE G G H :A B m c fa 1 1 6 5 .v a c 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?