Mitchell v. Felker et al

Filing 152

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/11/2013 ORDERING plaintiffs may depose Matthew Cate and Dr. Jeffrey Beard, each deposition shall not exceed four hours; plaintiffs' request for an order directing defendants "to p roduce Dr. Beard's reports analyzing and making recommendations regarding CDCR's lockdown policy and related documents," Dckt. No. 146 at 10, is DENIED, without prejudice; defendants shall produce all e-mails relevant to the noticed depositions by 3/8/2013; defendants shall produce all remaining electronic discovery by 3/29/2013; and the Clerk shall terminate docket entry 142 . (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT MITCHELL, et al., Plaintiffs, 11 12 vs. 13 No. 2:08-cv-1196 JAM EFB P T. FELKER, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 On February 6, 2013, the court heard plaintiffs’ motion to compel. Dckt. No. 144. 16 17 Attorneys Damon McClain and Marisa Kirschenbauer appeared at the hearing on behalf of 18 defendants; attorney Geoffrey Holtz appeared on behalf of plaintiffs. As stated on the record and 19 for the reasons stated on the record, plaintiffs’ motion is granted, in part, as follows: 20 1. Plaintiffs may depose Matthew Cate and Dr. Jeffrey Beard. Each deposition shall not 21 exceed four hours. Plaintiffs’ request for an order directing defendants “to produce Dr. Beard’s 22 reports analyzing and making recommendations regarding CDCR’s lockdown policy and related 23 documents,” Dckt. No. 146 at 10, is denied, without prejudice. 2. Defendants shall produce all e-mails relevant to the noticed depositions by March 8, 24 25 2013. Defendants shall produce all remaining electronic discovery by March 29, 2013. 26 //// 1 1 3. The Clerk shall terminate docket entry 142. 2 So Ordered. 3 Dated: February 11, 2013. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?