Mitchell v. Felker et al
Filing
181
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/19/13 ORDERING that upon reconsideration of the order of the Magistrate Judge filed 9/23/11 is affirmed. If plaintiffs would like the court to modify the briefing schedule and/or hearing date in order to provide them additional time to prepare their reply briefs, they may do so by filing an appropriate motion before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ROBERT MITCHELL,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
No. CIV S-08-1196 JAM EFB P
T. FELKER, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
/
16
17
ORDER
Plaintiffs are state prisoners proceeding with counsel in an action brought under
42 U.S.C. § 1983.
18
On March 26, 2013, plaintiffs filed a request for reconsideration of the Magistrate
19
Judge’s order filed March 20, 2013, granting defendants’ request for an extension of time to file
20
oppositions to plaintiffs’ motions for class certification and preliminary injunction. Dckt. No.
21
176. Plaintiffs argue that the order gives them insufficient time to file reply briefs before the
22
currently scheduled hearing date of June 12, 2013.
23
Pursuant to E.D. Cal. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be
24
upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court
25
finds that it does not appear that the Magistrate Judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary
26
to law.
1
1
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the
2
Magistrate Judge filed September 23, 2011 is affirmed. If plaintiffs would like the court to
3
modify the briefing schedule and/or hearing date in order to provide them additional time to
4
prepare their reply briefs, they may do so by filing an appropriate motion before the assigned
5
magistrate judge.
6
DATED: April 19, 2013
7
8
9
10
/
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?