Mitchell v. Felker et al
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/6/2013 ORDERING that plaintiff's 185 request to remove the confidentiality desination from pages of Mr. Kelly Harrington's 3/12/13, deposition transcript, as well as accompanying exhibits is GRANTED as to pages 362-367, and 369 and Exhibit 238, and DENIED as to Exhibit 241; plaintiffs' 185 request to submit Exhibit 241 to the state court under seal is also DENIED; plaintiff's 184 request to seal is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the Clerk shall file UNDER SEAL Exhibit C. (See Order for Details) (Yin, K)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROBERT MITCHELL, et al.,
No. 2:08-cv-1196 TLN EFB P
T. FELKER, et al.,
Plaintiffs are state prisoners proceeding with counsel in an action brought under 42
U.S.C. § 1983. On September 17, 2012, the undersigned approved the parties’ Stipulated
Protective Order, which permits the parties to in good faith, designate as confidential any
discovery responses “that might compromise the safety or security of a prison or prisoner.”
Dckt. No. 123 (“Protective Order”) § A. Plaintiffs now move to remove defendants’
confidentiality designations from certain pages of the Kelly Harrington deposition transcript, or
alternatively, to modify the terms of the Protective Order. Dckt. No. 1851; see also Protective
Order § B(10)(b) (reserving the right of any party to apply to the court for an order removing the
confidential material designation from any documents).
Plaintiffs also filed a motion to seal the documents submitted in support of the abovereferenced motion. Dckt. No. 184.
On June 5, 2013, the court heard plaintiffs’ motion. Attorney Julianne Mossler appeared
at the hearing on behalf of defendants; attorney Rebekah Evenson appeared on behalf of
plaintiffs. As stated on the record and for the reasons stated on the record, it is hereby
1. Plaintiffs’ request to remove the confidentiality designation from pages 362-367, and
369 of Mr. Kelly Harrington’s March 12, 2013, deposition transcript, as well as accompanying
exhibits 238 and 241 (Dckt. No. 185) is: (a) granted as to pages 362-367, and 369 and Exhibit
238; and (b) denied as to Exhibit 241. Thus, pages 362-367, and 369 and Exhibit 238 are not
confidential and not covered by the Protective Order; Exhibit 241 is confidential and is covered
by the Protective Order. Plaintiffs’ request to submit Exhibit 241 to the state court under seal
(Dckt. No. 185) is also denied.
2. In accordance with the above, plaintiffs’ request to seal (Dckt. No. 184) is: (a) denied
as to the unredacted request to remove the confidentiality designations and Exhibits A and B
thereto; and (b) granted as to Exhibit C thereto. The Clerk of Court is directed to file under seal
DATED: June 6, 2013.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?