Mitchell v. Felker et al
Filing
91
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/27/2011 ORDERING 86 Defendants Request for Reconsideration is DENIED. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT MITCHELL,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
TOM FELKER, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:08-CV-1196-JAM-EFB
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Tom Felker, J.
19
Walker, C. Buckley, D. Vanderville, D. Leiber, J. Mayfield, A.
20
Masuret, T. Barnard, J. Owen, D. Hellwig, T. Kimzey, D. Cade, R.
21
Blanthorn, R. Beamon, T. Lockwood, J. McClure, J. Tilton, M. Wright
22
and F. Foulk (collectively “Defendants”) Request for
23
Reconsideration by the District Court of the Magistrate Judge’s
24
Ruling (Doc. #86).
25
Magistrate Judge’s September 22, 2011 order granting Plaintiff
26
leave to amend his complaint to add additional parties, dismiss
27
some parties, allege certain claims on behalf of a state-wide
28
class, and dismiss some claims (Doc. #83).
Defendants seek reconsideration of the
1
Plaintiff Robert
1
Mitchell (“Plaintiff”) opposes the request (Doc. #89).
2
Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f) and Federal
3
Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) provide that the District Court may
4
modify or set aside a magistrate judge’s order if the order is
5
clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
6
the Court does not find the Magistrate Judge’s order to be clearly
7
erroneous or contrary to law.
8
for Reconsideration is DENIED.
9
10
Having reviewed the papers,
Accordingly, the Defendants’ Request
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 27, 2011
____________________________
JOHN A. MENDEZ,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?