Mitchell v. Felker et al

Filing 91

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/27/2011 ORDERING 86 Defendants Request for Reconsideration is DENIED. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT MITCHELL, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. TOM FELKER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:08-CV-1196-JAM-EFB ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Tom Felker, J. 19 Walker, C. Buckley, D. Vanderville, D. Leiber, J. Mayfield, A. 20 Masuret, T. Barnard, J. Owen, D. Hellwig, T. Kimzey, D. Cade, R. 21 Blanthorn, R. Beamon, T. Lockwood, J. McClure, J. Tilton, M. Wright 22 and F. Foulk (collectively “Defendants”) Request for 23 Reconsideration by the District Court of the Magistrate Judge’s 24 Ruling (Doc. #86). 25 Magistrate Judge’s September 22, 2011 order granting Plaintiff 26 leave to amend his complaint to add additional parties, dismiss 27 some parties, allege certain claims on behalf of a state-wide 28 class, and dismiss some claims (Doc. #83). Defendants seek reconsideration of the 1 Plaintiff Robert 1 Mitchell (“Plaintiff”) opposes the request (Doc. #89). 2 Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f) and Federal 3 Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) provide that the District Court may 4 modify or set aside a magistrate judge’s order if the order is 5 clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 6 the Court does not find the Magistrate Judge’s order to be clearly 7 erroneous or contrary to law. 8 for Reconsideration is DENIED. 9 10 Having reviewed the papers, Accordingly, the Defendants’ Request IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 27, 2011 ____________________________ JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?