Jaspar v. Knowles et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/13/09 ORDERING that petitioner's 15 request for transfer is DENIED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. MIKE KNOWLES, Warden, et al., Respondents. / On March 30, 2009, the court determined that petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is successive under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(3) and dismissed the petition without prejudice to refiling upon obtaining the necessary authorization from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petitioner now asks that the court transfer this action to the Ninth Circuit so that he may obtain the necessary authorization. However, transfer is not necessary or ///// ///// ///// ///// ///// 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MATTHEW LEE JASPAR, Petitioner, No. CIV S-08-1207 MCE KJM P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 warranted because petitioner may file his request for authorization with the Ninth Circuit by himself. Therefore, petitioner's request for transfer (#15) is denied. DATED: July 13, 2009. 1 jasp1207.suc 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?