Luque et al v. Adventist Health et al

Filing 65

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/1/2013 ORDERING the qui tam Complaint is DISMISSED; DISMISSING CASE with prejudice as to California and Relators; with prejudice to the US to the extent of the Covered Conduct, as that term is defined in the Settlement Agreement, and otherwise without prejudice to the US. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 2 CATHERINE J. SWANN Assistant United States Attorney 3 501 I Street, 10th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 4 Telephone: (916) 554-2762 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 5 Attorneys for the United States of America 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND STATE Case No. 2:08 - CV - 1272 MCE DAD 10 OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. HECTOR LUQUE AND ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ, ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION OF 11 DISMISSAL BY THE UNITED STATES AND Plaintiffs, RELATORS 12 v. 13 ADVENTIST HEALTH, WHITE MEMORIAL 14 MEDICAL CENTER, AND GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER, 15 Defendants. 16 Upon consideration of the Stipulation of Dismissal of the qui tam Complaint, filed by the 17 United States, California and Relators, it is hereby ORDERED that the qui tam Complaint is dismissed. 18 Pursuant to and consistent with the terms of the Settlement Agreement between the parties, effective 19 May 2, 2013, (hereinafter "Settlement Agreement"), the dismissal shall be with prejudice as to 20 California and Relators; with prejudice to the United States to the extent of the Covered Conduct, as that 21 term is defined in the Settlement Agreement, and otherwise without prejudice to the United States. The 22 matter having been resolved in its entirety, the Clerk of Court is directed to close the file. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: July 1, 2013 26 27 28 [Proposed] Order on Joint Stipulation of Dismissal By the United States and Relators 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?