Cato v. Jones, et al.,
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/10/09 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's 1 application for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed. Motion referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr., Objections to F&R due w/in 20 days. (Yin, K)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Respondents. / On June 9, 2008, petitioner filed an application for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court appointed counsel for petitioner on October 23, 2008. On March 31, 2009 counsel informed the court that petitioner has been deported with no forwarding address and that the claims presented by petitioner in his application do not provide a basis for habeas relief. In light of these facts, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty 1 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RODOLFO MENDEZ CATO, Petitioner, No. CIV S-08-1289 FCD KJM P
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: April 10, 2009.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?