Jennings v. Moreland et al

Filing 277

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/15/2015 DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's 275 motion for PLU status. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MATTHEW G. JENNINGS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:08-cv-1305 MCE CKD P v. ORDER A. MORELAND, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion entitled “Motion for 6 17 18 Months Priority Law Library Status.” (ECF No. 275.) In his motion, plaintiff alleges that a court 19 order is necessary before he can use the law library and he therefore requests that the court issue 20 an order granting him “Preferred Legal User” status. Plaintiff requests PLU status in order to prepare for his trial, which is set for February 21 22 2016. (ECF No. 264.) In May 2015, however, plaintiff is not under a present obligation to 23 submit documents and thus has not demonstrated that his right of access to the courts is being 24 impaired. The court will not order that plaintiff be granted six months’ PLU status at this time. 25 However, plaintiff may renew his motion for PLU status later this year, covering the six-month 26 period before trial, and the court will reconsider his request. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for PLU status (ECF No. 2 275) is denied without prejudice to renewal. 3 Dated: May 15, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 2 / jenn1305.80 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?