Jennings v. Moreland et al
Filing
277
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/15/2015 DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's 275 motion for PLU status. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MATTHEW G. JENNINGS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:08-cv-1305 MCE CKD P
v.
ORDER
A. MORELAND, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion entitled “Motion for 6
17
18
Months Priority Law Library Status.” (ECF No. 275.) In his motion, plaintiff alleges that a court
19
order is necessary before he can use the law library and he therefore requests that the court issue
20
an order granting him “Preferred Legal User” status.
Plaintiff requests PLU status in order to prepare for his trial, which is set for February
21
22
2016. (ECF No. 264.) In May 2015, however, plaintiff is not under a present obligation to
23
submit documents and thus has not demonstrated that his right of access to the courts is being
24
impaired. The court will not order that plaintiff be granted six months’ PLU status at this time.
25
However, plaintiff may renew his motion for PLU status later this year, covering the six-month
26
period before trial, and the court will reconsider his request.
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for PLU status (ECF No.
2
275) is denied without prejudice to renewal.
3
Dated: May 15, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
2 / jenn1305.80
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?