Northrup v. Attorney General of the State of California
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/20/09 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Petition 1 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Defendants. / By order filed October 29, 2008, the court granted plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. In the October 29th order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. For the reasons given in the October 29, 2008, order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate 1 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS vs. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RON L. NORTHRUP, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-08-1321 MCE GGH P
1 2 3 4
Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. DATED: January 20, 2009 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?