Adler v. Relynet, Inc., et al.,

Filing 161

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/28/09 ORDERING that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Internet Brands, Inc are dismissed with prejudice. (Duong, D) Modified on 12/28/2009 (Duong, D).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Patrick A. Fraioli, Jr (SBN 191824) Lauren J. Katunich (SBN 227599) ERVIN COHEN & JESSUP LLP 9401 Wilshire Boulevard, Ninth Floor Beverly Hills, California 90212-2974 Telephone (310) 273-6333 Facsimile (310) 859-2325 Wendy Giberti (AZ SBN 020162) Pro Hac Vice - date [7/30/09] Internet Brands, Inc. 909 N. Sepulveda Blvd., 11th Floor El Segundo, CA 90245 Telephone (310) 280-4365 Facsimile (310) 280-4951 Attorneys for Internet Brands, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DUSTIN K. ADLER, an individual, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) RELYNET, INC., a California ) Corporation, MICHAEL DICARLO, an ) individual, INTERNET BRANDS, INC., ) a Delaware Corporation, INTERMEDIA ) OUTDOORS, INC., a Delaware ) Corporation, VORTEX MEDIA ) GROUP, INC., a Delaware Corporation, ) and DOES 1 through 50, inclusively,, ) ) Defendant. ) ) CASE NO. 2:08-CV-01333-JAM-EFB ORDER RE: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF INTERNET BRANDS, INC. This matter, having come before the Court upon oral stipulation by Plaintiff Dustin K. Adler and Defendant Internet Brands, Inc. at the final pretrial conference on December 16, 2009, as set forth in this Court's Final Pretrial Conference Order [Docket #154], and good cause appearing, the Court hereby rules as follows: 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Internet Brands, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2009 /s/ John A. Mendez John A. Mendez United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?