Rosales et al v. Career Systems Development Corporation
Filing
84
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 04/20/10. Hearing for Motions in Limine set for 8/10/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. Jury Trial re-set for 8/10/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. (Williams, D)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
ANDREWS · LAGASSE · BRANCH & BELL LLP 11232 El Camino Real, Suite 250 San Diego, CA 92130
JONATHAN D. ANDREWS (SBN: 199256) SHAUNA L. DURRANT (SBN: 228489) ANDREWS · LAGASSE · BRANCH & BELL LLP 11232 El Camino Real, Suite 250 San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: (858) 345-5080 Facsimile: (858) 345-5025 Email: jandrews@albblaw.com Attorneys for Defendant CAREER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MELVIN ROSALES and CHARLIE HARRIS, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) vs. ) ) CAREER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ) CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; and ) DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ) ) ) Defendant. ) TO THE HONORABLE COURT: Plaintiff Melvyn Rosales ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Career Systems Development Corporation ("Defendant"), through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows: 1. On November 3, 2008, the Court issued its Pretrial Scheduling Order setting trial CASE NO.: 08-CV-01383-WBS-KJM JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL Trial: April 27, 2010
in the matter to begin on November 3, 2009. 2. On September 14, 2009, the Court continued the hearing on Defendant's motion
for summary judgment and vacated the November 3, 2009 trial date. 3. 4. On September 15, 2009, the Court reset the trial date to March 9, 2010. On January 8, 2010, the Court reset the trial date to April 27, 2010 per the
stipulation of counsel. 5. Jonathan Andrews and Shauna Durrant are trial counsel for Defendant. -1JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL
Tit
08-CV-01383-WBS-KJM
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
ANDREWS · LAGASSE · BRANCH & BELL LLP 11232 El Camino Real, Suite 250 San Diego, CA 92130
6.
Mr. Andrews and Ms. Durrant have another matter set for a two-week trial on
May 11, 2010 in the Southern District with Judge Benitez. 7. June, and July. 8. 9. The first date available for all parties is August 10, 2010. The parties are also actively pursuing resolution of this matter before trial. The James Ashworth is trial counsel for Plaintiff. Mr. Ashworth has trials set in May,
parties have attended a full day mediation with Judge Ellen Sickles-James of JAMS and intend to continue settlement discussions. 10. The parties agree that a continuation of trial in this matter will not prejudice either
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
party, and is in furtherance of justice. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY stipulated by and between Plaintiff and Defendant to continue the present scheduled trial in the above-entitled action currently set for April 27, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 5, to August 10, 2010, or as soon thereafter as is convenient for this Court. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: April 19, 2010 LAW OFFICE OF MARY ALICE COLEMAN By: /s/ James Ashworth James Ashworth Attorney for Plaintiff MELVYN ROSALES
Dated: April 19, 2010
ANDREWS · LAGASSE · BRANCH & BELL LLP By: /s/ Shauna L. Durrant Jonathan D. Andrews Shauna L. Durrant Attorneys for Defendant CAREER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
-2JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL
Tit
08-CV-01383-WBS-KJM
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
ANDREWS · LAGASSE · BRANCH & BELL LLP 11232 El Camino Real, Suite 250 San Diego, CA 92130
ORDER Pursuant to the above stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED. Trial is reset to August 10, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. All pending motions in limine (docket entries 62, 63, 64, 67, 71 and 72) shall be heard on that same date and time. Dated: April 20, 2010
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL
Tit
08-CV-01383-WBS-KJM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?