USA v. Approximately $38,198.63 in US Currency seized from Scottrade Investment Account

Filing 15

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/17/09 ORDERING the Court received the Notice of Related Cases filed 9/11/09. Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that both actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 83-123(a), E.D. Cal. (1997). The actions involve the same parties, are based on the same or a similar claim, and involve the same property transaction or event. Because the cases are already assigned to the same district judge, this Order is issued for informational purposes only and shall have no effect on the status of the cases. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court received the Notice of Related Cases filed September 11, 2009. Examination of the above-entitled actions v. FU LONG RICKY WU, et al., Defendants. ___________________________/ Defendant. ___________________________/ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, No. 2:08-cr-00064-MCE v. APPROXIMATELY $38,198.63 IN U.S. CURRENCY SEIZED FROM SCOTTRADE INVESTMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER 198-30999-10, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, RELATED CASE ORDER No. 2:08-cv-01384-MCE-GGH UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA reveals that both actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 83-123(a), E.D. Cal. (1997). /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The actions involve the same parties, are based on the same or a similar claim, and involve the same property transaction or event. Because the cases are already assigned to the same district judge, this Order is issued for informational purposes only and shall have no effect on the status of the cases. Dated: September 17, 2009 _____________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?