Van Buren v. Johnson et al

Filing 18

ORDER adopting 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 11/24/09: Plaintiff is approved to proceed in forma pauperis, and the Complaint is dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#12, entered July 29, 2009), entered by the Honorable Valerie P. Cooke regarding Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis and the Court's required screening of the Complaint. No objection was filed to Magistrate Judge Cooke's Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with Local Rule 72-304(b) of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, and the matter was submitted for consideration. The court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Local Rule 72-304(b) and determines that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Cooke should be accepted and adopted. //// //// 1 MAURICE VAN BUREN, ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) vs. ) ) SARA JOHNSON, et al., ) ) Defendant(s). ) ____________________________________) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION *** 2:08-CV-1393-RLH (VPC) ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#12, entered July 29, 2009) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, Plaintiff is approved to proceed in forma pauperis, and the Complaint is dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend. Dated: November 24, 2009. _________________________________ ROGER L. HUNT Chief U.S. District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?