Motley v. Smith et al

Filing 48

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 8/10/10: Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 44 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, and Magistrate Judge Cooke's prior Report and Recommendation 20 is amended as recommended. (Kaminski, H)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#44, filed July 19, 2010), entered by the Honorable Valerie P. Cooke, amending or correcting a previous Report and Recommendation (#15), which the District Judge adopted (#20). No objection was filed to Magistrate Judge Cooke's second Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with Local Rule IB 3-2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, and the matter was submitted for consideration. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Local Rule IB 3-2 and determines that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge (#44) should be accepted and adopted. //// 1 EDWARD MOTLEY, ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) vs. ) ) J. SMITH, et al., ) ) Defendant(s). ) ____________________________________)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
***

2:08-CV-01423-RLH-VPC ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#44, entered July 19, 2010) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, and Magistrate Judge Cooke's prior Report and Recommendation (#20) is amended as recommended. Dated: August 10, 2010.

______________________________________ ROGER L. HUNT Chief U.S. District Judge

2