Anderson et al vs United States of America
Filing
45
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/30/10: This case shall be dismissed, with prejudice, in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own costs, including attorney's fees. (Kaminski, H)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
WILCOXEN CALLAHAN MONTGOMERY & DEACON DANIEL E. WILCOXEN, SBN 054805 W ALTER H. LOVING, III, SBN 109348 2114 K Street Sacramento, California 95816 Telephone: (916) 442-2777 Facsimile: (916) 442-4118 Attorneys for Plaintiffs CHERIE ANDERSON, MATT ANDERSON, DAWN ANDERSON, GEORGE ANDERSON and MICHAEL ANDERSON
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHERIE A. ANDERSON, MATT ANDERSON, DAWN ANDERSON, GEORGE ANDERSON and MICHAEL ANDERSON, Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. ________________________________/ The parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that the Complaint Civil No. . 2:08-CV-01444 JAM-JEM STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
18 in this action and all amended complaints, shall be dismissed, with prejudice, in its 19 20 21 Dated: April 8, 2010 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// 1 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE /s/ Walter H. Loving, III Walter H. Loving, III Attorneys for Plaintiffs CHERIE ANDERSON, MATT ANDERSON, DAWN ANDERSON, GEORGE ANDERSON and MICHAEL ANDERSON WILCOXEN CALLAHAN MONTGOMERY & DEACON entirety. It is further stipulated that each party is to bear its own costs, including
WILCOXEN tCALLAHAN MONTGOMERY & DEACON at orney's fees.
2114 K Street, Sacramento, California 95816
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated: April 8, 2010
ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
/s/ Todd A. Pickles Todd A. Pickles Attorney for Defendant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 30, 2010 /s/ John A. Mendez JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?