Johnson v. Soltani, et al

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 4/1/2010. Attorney Cris C. Vaughn's 16 20 Motion(s) are GRANTED as to defendant Ghodrat Soltani but DENIED as to defendant Kamyar Soltani. The Hearing for the 20 Motion is vacated and Final Pretrial Conference has been CONTINUED to 6/7/2010 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB). Trial is still scheduled to commence on 7/20/2010 at 9:00 AM. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 * IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) GHODRAT SOLTANI, Individually and ) d/b/a South Japanese Motors, KAMYAR) SOLTANI, ) ) Defendants. ) ) 2:08-cv-01446-GEB-GGH ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENSE COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD* On March 5, 2010, Defendants' Counsel Cris C. Vaughan ("Vaughan"), filed a motion to withdraw as attorney of record for Defendants based on two documents Defendant Ghodrat Soltani ("Ghodrat") filed with the Court on February 25, 2010, and March 1, 2010. Vaughan argues these documents show that "Defendants have now expressed their desire to represent themselves in this case" and therefore, under Eastern District of California Local Rule ("Local Rule") 182(d) and California Rule of Professional Conduct 3-700(C)(5), Vaughan should be permitted to withdraw as counsel since Defendants have "knowingly and freely assent[ed] to termination of [Vaughan's] employment." (Mot. 2:10-13.) Vaughan's motion is GRANTED as to Ghodrat since Ghodrat signed a letter filed February 24, 2010, in which Ghodrat states: "Vaughan is no longer my attorney for the above-referenced case argument. This matter is deemed to be suitable for decision without oral E.D. Cal. R. 230(g). 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 because his services are no longer needed. representing myself." (Docket No. 14.) Therefore I will be However, Vaughan's motion to withdraw as counsel for Defendant Kamyar Soltani ("Kamyar") is DENIED, since Vaughan has not explained why he should be allowed to withdraw as counsel for Kamyar, who was not party to either document Ghodrat filed. Further, Local Rule 182(d) requires Vaughan to "provide an affidavit stating the current or last known address . . . of the client and the efforts made to notify the client of the motion to withdraw." 182(d)(emphasis added). E.D. Cal. R. Vaughan has not explained his attempts to notify Kamyar of his motion, nor has he provided Kamyar's address. Kamyar's last known address is particularly important since the final pretrial conference is scheduled for April 19, 2010, and a joint pretrial statement is due seven days before the final pretrial conference. Since the attorney representation issue has surfaced close to the final pretrial conference date, and it appears that date should be rescheduled, the final pretrial conference is continued to June 7, 2010, at 11:00 a.m. 2010, at 9:00 a.m. Trial is still scheduled to commence on July 20, Further, the hearing on the motion scheduled for April 5, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., is VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 1, 2010 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?