Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sierra Pacific Industries

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/26/09 ORDERING that on 9/24/09, plaintiff filed a motion to compel and noticed the motion for hearing before the undersigned on 10/16/09. By minute order filed 9/24/09, the hearing was vacated due to the court's unavailability, and plaintiff was directed to renotice the motion for hearing on a date other than 10/16/09 and 10/23/09. More than thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not re-noticed the motion. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to compel 29 is denied without prejudice. (Becknal, R)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 SIERRA PACIFIC INDUSTRIES, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:kw Ddad1/orders.civil/eeoc1470.mtc.ord

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, No. CIV S-08-1470 MCE DAD

ORDER /

On September 24, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion to compel and noticed the motion for hearing before the undersigned on October 16, 2009. By minute order filed September 24, 2009, the hearing was vacated due to the court's unavailability, and plaintiff was directed to renotice the motion for hearing on a date other than October 16, 2009 and October 23, 2009. More than thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not re-noticed the motion. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. No. 29) is denied without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 26, 2009.