Ludavico v. Sacramento County et al

Filing 96

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/16/2012 GRANTING 89 Stipulated request to modify the amended pretrial scheduling order; the Court's second amended pretrial scheduling order is hereby VACATED; a third amended pretrial scheduling order will issue. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5

William E. Bonham, SB# 55478
Attorney at Law
Hotel de France Bldg., Old Sacramento
916 Second Street, 2nd Floor, Ste. A
Sacramento, California 95814
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiffs: Thomas LUDAVICO, Sr., Thomas LUDAVICO, Jr., Ashley LUDAVICO

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

Michael W. Pott, SBN 186156
Derek J. Haynes, SBN 264621
350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants SACRAMENTO COUNTY, SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT, JOHN MCGINNESS, DANIEL ZUNIGA, ADRIAN ZUNIGA, DEXTER POWE,
MICHAEL HELLER (erroneously sued as “MUELLER”) BRETT SCHANNEP (erroneously sued as
“SCHANAP”), GREGORY HANKS, CHRIS MORA, JOHN SYDOW, and CHRIS WEIGHTMAN

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17
18

THOMAS LUDAVICO, Sr., THOMAS
LUDAVICO, Jr.; ASHLEY LUDAVICO,

19

Plaintiffs,

20

vs.

21

SACRAMENTO COUNTY, a Government
Entity;
SACRAMENTO
COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, a Public Entity;
JOHN MCGINNESS, an individual; DANIEL
ZUNIGA, an individual; ADRIAN ZUNIGA,
an individual; DEPUTY POWE, an individual;
DEPUTY M. HELLER, an individual;
DEPUTY SCHANNEP, an individual;
SERGEANT G. HANKS, an individual;
SERGEANT MORA, an individual; DEPUTY
SYDOW,
an
individual;
DEPUTY
WEIGHTMAN, an individual; and DOES 1 to
50, inclusive,
Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

CASE NO. 2:08-CV-01473-MCE-JFM
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
REQUEST TO MODIFY THE AMENDED
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
Complaint Filed: 06/24/2008
2nd Corrected 2nd Amended Complaint Filed:
08/05/2011
Third Amended Complaint Filed: 07/03/2012

1
{01060214.DOC}ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY
THE AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

1

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the parties’ stipulated request to modify the Amended Pretrial

2

Scheduling Order is GRANTED. The Court’s Second Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order [ECF No.

3

89] is hereby vacated. A Third Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order will issue.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: October 16, 2012

7

__________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10

DEAC_Signature-END:

c4d6b0d3

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
{01060214.DOC}ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY
THE AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER