Bolden v. CSS

Filing 23

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/01/09 ORDERING that dft's opposition to plf's 17 Motion for Summary Judgment is due 04/30/09. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAWRENCE G. BROWN Acting United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration ARMAND D. ROTH Special Assistant United States Attorney California Bar No. 214624 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8924 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail:Armand.Roth@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION LAKENYA R. BOLDEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________) CIVIL NO. 08-cv-01481-GEB-EFB STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate that the time for filing defendant's opposition to plaintiff's motion be extended from March 30, 2009 to April 30, 2009. This is defendant's first request for an extension of time to file a response to plaintiff's opening brief. This case was recently reassigned to defendant's counsel who needs the additional time to prepare a response. Respectfully submitted, Dated: March 26, 2009 /s/ Ann M. Cerney, (As authorized this day via telephone) ANN M. CERNEY Attorney for Plaintiff LAWRENCE G. BROWN Acting United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration /s/ Armand D. Roth ARMAND D. ROTH) Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated: April 1, 2009. Dated: March 26, 2009 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?