UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Saavedra
JUDGMENT BASED ON STIPULATION signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/22/09 ORDERING that Defendant shall pay to Plaintiffs in settlement of this action the total sum of $1980.00; Defendant shall pay Plaintiffs' costs of suit (complaint filing fee and service of process fee) in the amount of $420.00; and The Court declines to enter an injunction since an injunction has not been shown necessary. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)
1 HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP 2 560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 3 Telephone: (415) 268-2000 4 www.hro.com
Dawniell Zavala (State Bar No. 253130) San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 Facsimile: (415) 268-1999
5 Attorney for Plaintiffs 6 UMG RECORDINGS, INC.; BMG 7 ENTERTAINMENT; CAPITOL
MUSIC; SONY BMG MUSIC INC.
8 LLC; and VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION CASE NO. 2:08-CV-01521-GEB-DAD
RECORDS, LLC; LAFACE RECORDS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation; BMG MUSIC, a New York general partnership; SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general partnership; CAPITOL RECORDS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; LAFACE RECORDS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiffs, vs. Amber Saavedra, Defendant. Case No.: 2:08-cv-01521-GEB-DAD Related Cases: JUDGMENT BASED ON STIPULATION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The Court, having considered the Stipulated Judgment executed by the parties, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT: 1. Defendant shall pay to Plaintiffs in settlement of this action the total
sum of $1980.00. 2. Defendant shall pay Plaintiffs' costs of suit (complaint filing fee and
service of process fee) in the amount of $420.00. 3. The Court declines to enter an injunction since an injunction has not
been shown necessary. See, eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. , 547 U.S. 388, 393 (2006) (stating "this Court has consistently rejected invitations to replace traditional equitable considerations with a rule that an injunction automatically follows a determination that a copyright has been infringed."). DATED: 1/22/09
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge
[Proposed] Judgment and Permanent Injunction Case No. 2:08-cv-01521-GEB-DAD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?