Dixon v. O'Connor, et al

Filing 63

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lloyd D. George on 8/29/11 GRANTING 62 Motion for Extension. Plaintiff must file any opposition to defs Knipp, Martel, Grannis, and O'Connor's motion to dismiss by 9/7/11. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

DANIEL STEVE DIXON,

8

2:08-CV-01546-LDG

Plaintiff,
ORDER

9

v.

10

J.S. O’CONNOR, et al.,

11

Defendants.

12
13

Plaintiff Daniel Steve Dixon has filed a second request for extension of time to file an

14

opposition to Defendants Knipp, Martel, Grannis, and O’Connor’s motion to dismiss (#62).

15

Dixon requests a 14-day extension based on inadequate library access. Therefore, for good cause

16

shown,

17

THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that Plaintiff’s request for extension of time to file

18

(#62) is GRANTED. Plaintiff must file any opposition to Defendants Knipp, Martel, Grannis, and

19

O’Connor’s motion to dismiss by September 7, 2011.

20
21

Dated this ____ day of August, 2011.

22
23
24
25
26

________________________
Lloyd D. George
United States District Judge