Johnson v. Sisto et al
Filing
130
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 03/31/2012. Defendants Shockley's and Deur's June 7, 2011 motion to dismiss 94 is granted; Defendant Sisto's July 26, 2011 motion to dismiss is granted 110 ; The findings and recommendations filed January 27, 2012, are adopted in full 124 . (Andrews, P)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
LACEDRIC W. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
vs.
D.K. SISTO, Warden, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
/
15
16
No. Civ S-08-1609 KJM KJN P
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On January 27, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations,
20
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
21
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
24
304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file,
25
the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the
26
proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 27, 2012, are adopted in full;
3
2. Defendant Shockley’s June 7, 2011 motion to dismiss (Docket No. 94) is
4
granted;
5
6
3. Defendant Sisto’s July 26, 2011 motion to dismiss (Docket No. 110) is
granted;
7
8
4. Defendant Deur’s June 7, 2011 motion to dismiss (Docket No. 94) is granted;
and
9
10
5. Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Sisto, Shockley and Deur are dismissed.
DATED: March 31, 2012.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
/john1609.805
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?