Johnson v. Sisto et al
Filing
99
ORDER denying 97 Motion for Default Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/24/11. (Matson, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
LACEDRIC W. JOHNSON,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
No. 2:08-cv-1609 KJM KJN P
D.K. SISTO, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On June 20, 2011,
17
plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment against defendant A. Noriega. (Dkt. No. 97.)
18
However, plaintiff’s motion is premature and is denied. A person by the name of Alfred Noriega
19
signed the waiver of service form on May 20, 2011. (Dkt. No. 92.) The waiver permits a
20
defendant sixty days in which to file a responsive pleading. Sixty days have not yet passed.
21
Therefore, plaintiff’s motion is premature. Moreover, Alfred Noriega included a letter stating he
22
has never been employed by the State of California or in any law enforcement or correction
23
agency, and has no affiliation with the plaintiff or the individuals listed in plaintiff’s second
24
amended complaint. In his motion, plaintiff alleges defendant A. Noriega has attempted to
25
commit fraud upon the court based upon this letter, but fails to explain how this letter is
26
fraudulent.
1
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s June 20, 2011 motion for default
2
judgment (dkt. no. 97) is denied without prejudice.
3
DATED: June 24, 2011
4
5
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
john1609.def
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?