Harris v. Walker et al

Filing 60

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/22/2009 ORDERING that pltf's response to dft's 55 Motion to Dismiss is due within 30 days. (Suttles, J) Modified on 10/27/2009 (Manzer, C).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 vs. JAMES WALKER, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed several interlocutory appeals challenging various non-final court orders. Those appeals have now been dismissed and jurisdiction has been returned to this court. Plaintiff's response to defendants' motion is due within 30 days of the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 22, 2009 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARVIN HARRIS, Plaintiff, ORDER No. CIV S-08-1615-GEB-CMK-P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA