Archambault v. Adesa Golden Gate

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 04/07/09 ORDERING that the action demonicated as No. CIV-S-09-0856 LKK KJM PS is reassigned from Magistrate Judge Mueller to Magistrate Judge Hollows. The caption on all documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as No. CIV S-09-0856 LKK GGH PS.(Streeter, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 JACQUELYN ARCHAMBAULT, 16 Plaintiff, 17 vs. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ADESA GOLDEN GATE, Defendant. / Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that assignment of the matters to the same magistrate judge is likely to effect a substantial saving of judicial effort. See Local Rule 83-123(a). The actions will therefore be assigned to the same magistrate judge. Pursuant to the regular practice of this court, the cases will be assigned to the magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned. Reassignment of the newer case 1 ORDER No. CIV S-09-0856 LKK KJM PS vs. ADESA GOLDEN GATE, Defendant. / ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JACQUELYN ARCHAMBAULT, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-08-1616 LKK GGH PS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 merely has the result that both actions are assigned to the same magistrate judge. No consolidation of the cases is effected. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The action denominated as No. CIV S-09-0856 LKK KJM PS is reassigned from Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller to Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows. Henceforth, the caption on all documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as No. CIV S-09-0856 LKK GGH PS; and 2. The Clerk of the Court shall make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. DATED: April 7, 2009 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 13 14 15 GGH:076 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Archambault0856.rel.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?