O'Campo v. Ghoman et al

Filing 26

ORDER adopting in full 25 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/26/12. Plaintiff's 19 Motion to Amend the Complaint is GRANTED; and plaintiff is GRANTED 21 days to file and serve his amended complaint. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

DIMAS O’CAMPO,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14

No. CIV S-08-1624 KJM DAD PS

vs.
RAGHBIR SINGH GHOMAN
dba QUIK SHOP 2; GHOMAN’S
PROPERTIES, LLC.,

ORDER

Defendants.

15

/

16
17

Defendant Raghbir Singh Ghoman is proceeding pro se in the above-entitled

18

action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under Local Rule

19

302(c)(21).

20

On November 10 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations,

21

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

22

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the

23

findings and recommendations. On November 15, 2011, that service was returned as to

24

defendant Raghbir Ghoman as undeliverable. On November 17, 2011, however, the findings and

25

recommendations were re-served on defendant Raghbir Ghoman. The fourteen-day period has

26

expired, and no party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
1

1

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United

2

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

3

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

4

1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to

5

be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

6

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

7

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 10, 2011 (Doc. No. 25) are

8

adopted in full;

9
10

2. Plaintiff’s January 17, 2011 motion to amend his complaint (Doc. No. 19) is
granted; and

11

3. Plaintiff is granted twenty-one (21) days to file and serve his amended

12

complaint.

13

DATED: January 26, 2012.

14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18

/ocampo1624.jo

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2