Thoms v. Walgreen Co.

Filing 53

JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff entered pursuant to Order entered on 4/8/2009 and signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/8/2009. (Gaydosh, J)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

11
ATTORNE Y S AT L A W

12
L O S ANGELES

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

NATHAN THOMS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. WALGREEN CO., an Illinois Corporation; and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:08-cv-01649-JAM-DAD JUDGMENT

LAS99 1725866-1.007341.0045

JUDGMENT

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

This action came on for hearing before this Court on March 25, 2009, the Honorable John A. Mendez, United States District Judge presiding, on the Motion of defendant Walgreen Co. for Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, for Summary Adjudication Against Plaintiff Nathan Thoms. After considering the papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the Motion, the pleadings and records on file in this action, the evidence presented, oral proceedings, and all other matter properly before the Court, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff Nathan Thoms take nothing, that the action be dismissed on the merits and that the defendant Walgreen Co. recover its costs.

11
ATTORNE Y S AT L A W

12
L O S ANGELES

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated:

April 8, 2009

/s/ John A. Mendez_______ Honorable John A. Mendez United States District Judge

AGREED AS TO FORM: McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP FRANCISCA M. MOK By: /s/ Francisca M. Mok FRANCISCA M. MOK Attorneys for Defendant WALGREEN CO. LINDSAY & STONEBARGER JAMES M. LINDSAY By: /s/ James M. Lindsay JAMES M. LINDSAY Attorneys for Plaintiff NATHAN THOMS

LAS99 1725866-1.007341.0045

JUDGMENT

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com