Mitchell v. Snowden et al

Filing 32

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Howard D. McKibben on 9/20/10 ORDERING pltf's request for extension of time 31 to file a response to dft Compton's motion to dismiss 20 is GRANTED; pltf shall have up to and including 10/18/10 in which to file his response. (Carlos, K)

(PC) Mitchell v. Snowden, et al

Doc. 32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff has requested a third extension of time (Docket 18 #31, inadvertently titled "Plaintiff's Second Motion for Extension 19 of Time to Oppose Defendant Compton's June 1, 2010 Motion to 20 Dismiss")in which to respond to defendant Compton's motion to 21 dismiss (Docket #20). 22 Plaintiff shall have up to and including Monday, October 18, 2010, 23 in which to file his response. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 DATED: This 20th day of September, 2010. 26 27 28 ____________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1
Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL J. Mitchell,

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) SNOWDEN, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ )

2:08-cv-01658-HDM -RAM ORDER GRANTING THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE A RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiff's request is hereby GRANTED.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2