Mitchell v. Snowden et al

Filing 66

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/20/2011 DENYING, as unnecessary, pltf's 65 motion for an extension of time. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL JEROME MITCHELL, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-08-1658 JAM DAD P SNOWDEN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to conduct discovery. At the time 17 plaintiff drafted his pending request he did not have the benefit of the court’s October 6, 2011 18 order. In that order, the court extended the deadline for the parties to conduct discovery until 19 January 6, 2012. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is therefore unnecessary. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for an extension 21 of time (Doc. No. 65) is denied as unnecessary. 22 DATED: October 20, 2011. 23 24 25 26 DAD:9 mitc1658.36d(2)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?