Mitchell v. Snowden et al

Filing 66

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/20/2011 DENYING, as unnecessary, pltf's 65 motion for an extension of time. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

MICHAEL JEROME MITCHELL,

11

Plaintiff,

12

vs.

13

No. CIV S-08-1658 JAM DAD P

SNOWDEN, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to conduct discovery. At the time

17

plaintiff drafted his pending request he did not have the benefit of the court’s October 6, 2011

18

order. In that order, the court extended the deadline for the parties to conduct discovery until

19

January 6, 2012. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is therefore unnecessary.

20

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for an extension

21

of time (Doc. No. 65) is denied as unnecessary.

22

DATED: October 20, 2011.

23
24
25
26

DAD:9
mitc1658.36d(2)