Ambrose v. Coffey
Filing
195
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/16/12 ORDERING that all dates are VACATED. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
JOSEPH AMBROSE, D.C., et al.
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
GARY COFFEY, et al.
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________ )
)
AND CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS
)
________________________________ )
Case No.: 2:08-CV-01664-LKK-GGH
[Consolidated with 2:09-CV-01477-LKK-GGH; 2:09CV-02062-LKK-GGH; 2:09-CV-2640-LKK-GGH]
ORDER
18
19
Having considered the stipulation of defendants and plaintiffs Joseph Ambrose, Michael Yates,
20
Richard Sausedo, and Pedram Vaezi, Wilmer Origel, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby
21
orders as follows:
22
23
All dates are VACATED. New dates will be set upon resolution of the pending motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: February 16, 2012.
26
27
28
-1________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER RECLASSIFYING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE TO CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
Submitted By:
2
Dennis B. Kass, State Bar No. 137263
MANNING & KASS
ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP
801 S. Figueroa St., 15th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: (213) 624-6900
Email: dbk@manningllp.com
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Richard G. Garcia, State Bar No. 198185
Scott D. Long, State Bar No. 203505
Patrick L. Hurley, State Bar No. 174438
MANNING & KASS
ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP
One California St., Suite 1100
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 217-6990
Email: rgg@manningllp.com
Attorneys for Defendants
WILLIAM REYNOLDS AND TRAVELERS PROPERTY
AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER RECLASSIFYING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE TO CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?