Ambrose v. Coffey

Filing 201

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/3/12 ORDERING that the parties appeared before the court for a status conference on 12/3/12, at 2:00 p.m. It appears to the court that this matter ought to be litigated in the state court because the o nly remaining cause of action is a state malicious prosecution claim. The parties have indicated that they are working on a stipulation to refile this case in the state court. The parties, therefore, SHALL submit such stipulation within fourteen (14) days of the issuance of this order. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOSEPH AMBROSE, D.C., NO. CIV. S-08-1664 LKK/GGH 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. O R D E R 12 GARY COFFEY, et al., 13 Defendants. / 14 15 The parties appeared before the court for a status conference 16 on December 3, 2012, at 2:00 p.m. 17 this matter ought to be litigated in the state court because the 18 only remaining cause of action is a state malicious prosecution 19 claim. 20 The parties have indicated It appears to the court that that they are working on a 21 stipulation to refile this case in the state court. 22 therefore, SHALL submit such stipulation within fourteen (14) days 23 of the issuance of this order. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 DATED: December 3, 2012. 26 1 The parties,

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?