Ambrose v. Coffey

Filing 206

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/10/13: This action be and hereby is dismissed without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 RICHARD J. SIMONS, ESQ. – SBN 072676 FURTADO, JASPOVICE & SIMONS A Law Corporation 22274 Main Street Hayward, California 94541 (510) 582-1080 Telephone (510) 582-8254 Facsimile Rick@fjslaw.com 5 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs JOSEPH AMBROSE, D.C.; RICHARD SAUSEDO; PEDRAM VAEZI; and MICHAEL YATES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 No: 2:08-CV-01664-LKK-GGH JOSEPH AMBROSE, D.C., Plaintiff, 11 [Consolidated with No. 2:09-CV-01477-LKK-GGH No. 2:09-CV-02062-LKK-GGH No. 2:09-CV-02640-LKK-GGH] 12 v. 13 GARY COFFEY, et al., 14 15 Defendants. _________________________________/ IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated 16 counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 17 FRCP 41 (a) (1). 18 Dated: January 7, 2013 19 FURTADO, JASPOVICE & SIMONS A Law Corporation By: /s/ Rick Simons Attorney for Plaintiffs JOSEPH AMBROSE, D.C.; RICHARD SAUSEDO; PEDRAM VAEZI; and MICHAEL YATES 20 21 22 23 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER Dated: January 7, 2013 MANNING & KASS ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP 24 25 26 27 By: /s/ Dennis B. Kass /s/ Richard G. Garcia Attorneys for Defendants William Reynolds and Travelers Property and Casualty Company of America 28 -1STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Dated: January 7, 2013 LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT D. RODRIGUEZ 2 By: /s/ ROBERT D. RODRGUEZ Attorney for Plaintiff, WILMER D. ORIGEL 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed without prejudice. 8 9 Dated: January 10, 2013. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?