Ndulue v. Fremont-Rideout Health Group, et al.

Filing 259

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/13/10: Settlement Conference RESET for 3/24/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
Ndulue v. Fremont-Rideout Health Group, et al. Doc. 259 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MICHAEL J. KHOURI, ESQ. [SBN 97654] ASHLEY K. NGUYEN, ESQ. [SBN 256207] LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL J. KHOURI 4040 Barranca Parkway, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92604 Telephone: (949) 336-2433 Fax: (949) 387-0044 Attorneys for Plaintiff CHUKWUEMEKA NDULUE E-mail: mkhouri@khourilaw.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHUKWUEMEKA NDULUE, Plaintiff, vs ORDER TO CONTINUE THE FREMONT-RIDEOUT HEALTH SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE GROUP; SUTTER NORTH MEDICAL GROUP, PC; DEL NORTE CLINICS, INC.; THE PEACH TREE CLINIC, INC.; LEONARD MARKS, M.D.; PUSHPA RAMAN, M.D.; CHERRY ANN WY, M.D.; ARUN KUMAR, M.D.; HARRY WANDER, M.D.; MAX LINS, M.D.; and DOES 1-100, inclusive Defendants. CASE NO. 2:08 CV-01696-WBS-KJM The Court has reviewed the parties' stipulation to continue the settlement conference currently set for December 16, 2010 to March 24, 2011. //// //// //// ORDER TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Upon finding GOOD CAUSE, the Court hereby ORDERS that the settlement conference currently set for December 16, 2010 is continued to March 24, 2011. SO ORDERED. DATED this 13th day of December, 2010. PREPARED BY: Dated: December 8, 2010. LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL J. KHOURI By: signature on original MICHAEL J. KHOURI, ESQ. ASHLEY K. NGUYEN, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff CHUKWUEMEKA NDULUE, M.D. ORDER TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?