Flores v. Walker et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by District Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/23/12; Plaintiff filed a Motion leave to file an amended complaint (#11), stating that he intended to "seek further clarity of the chronology of the facts" and dismiss certain parties. Plai ntiff filed his Second Amended Complaint (#15) on April 23, 2010. On May 6th, 2010 the Court issued an order noting that the Second Amended Complaint was essentially identical to the first and directing Plaintiff to seek leave of the Court if he wish ed to file another complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or taken any other action in this case for nearly two years. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b). Civil Case Terminated. CASE CLOSED.(Matson, R)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

OMAR FLORES,

7

Plaintiff,

8

v.

9

J. WALKER, et al.,

10

Case No. 2:08-CV-01709-KJD-PAL

Defendants.

ORDER

11
12
13

Plaintiff filed a Motion leave to file an amended complaint (#11), stating that he intended to

14

“seek further clarity of the chronology of the facts” and dismiss certain parties. Plaintiff filed his

15

Second Amended Complaint (#15) on April 23, 2010. On May 6th, 2010 the Court issued an order

16

noting that the Second Amended Complaint was essentially identical to the first and directing

17

Plaintiff to seek leave of the Court if he wished to file another complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an

18

amended complaint or taken any other action in this case for nearly two years. Accordingly, this

19

case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b).

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21

DATED this 23rd day of March 2012.

22
23
24
25
26

_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge