Barry v. Felker et al

Filing 58

ORDER signed by District Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/21/2012 DENYING plaintiff's 57 Motion for Appointment of Counsel without prejudice to re-file Motion with US Court of Appeal for Ninth Circuit. [cc: USCA - 9th Circuit] (Marciel, M)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6

TIMOTHY DEMOND BARRY,
7

Plaintiff,
8

v.
9

T. FELKER, et al.,
10

Defendants.
11
12

***
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:08-CV-01722-PMP-GWF
ORDER

Plaintiff Timothy Demond Barry’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc.

13

#57) is hereby DENIED without prejudice to re-file the Motion with the United States

14

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

DATED: March 21, 2012
_______________________________
PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge