Mitchell v. Walker et al

Filing 34

ORDER signed by District Judge Christina A. Snyder on 11/6/13 ORDERING that Defendants are GRANTED an Extension of time nunc pro tunc, to and including 10/18/2013, within which to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint in this Action. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

11
12
CORREY MITCHELL,

2:08-cv-1738 CAS (PC)

13
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER
14
v.
15
16

WALKER, et al. ,

17

Defendants.

18
19

Good cause having been shown, Defendants are granted an extension of time nunc pro tunc,

20

to and including October 18, 2013, within which to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s First

21

Amended Complaint in this action.

22
23
24

DATED: November 6, 2013

_____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER (2:08-cv-1738 CAS (PC))