Luu v. Immigration and Naturalization Service et al

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 01/29/2009 ADOPTING 15 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS. For the reason set forth in Order 12 , the Amended Petitioner 13 fails to cure the jurisdictional defect, is DISMISSED and this case is closed. CASE CLOSED. (Streeter, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE (INS), et al., Respondents. / ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA QUOC XUONG LUU, Petitioner, No. CIV S-08-1744 WBS GGH P Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On December 4, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /luu1744.805hc Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 4, 2008, are adopted in full; and 2. For the reason set forth in the Order, filed on October 28, 2008 (Docket No. 12), the amended petition filed on November 18, 2008 (Docket No. 13), which fails to cure the jurisdictional defect, is dismissed and this case is closed. DATED: January 29, 2009 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?